TLDR
HBO’s “Money Electric” documentary attempts to reveal Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto
Director Cullen Hoback suggests Bitcoin Core developer Peter Todd could be Satoshi
Evidence presented is largely circumstantial and speculative
Peter Todd denied being Satoshi before the documentary aired
The crypto community remains skeptical of the documentary’s claims
The HBO documentary “Money Electric: The Bitcoin Mystery” aired on Tuesday, October 8, 2024, promising to shed light on the identity of Satoshi Nakamoto, the mysterious creator of Bitcoin.
Directed by Cullen Hoback, the film delves into Bitcoin’s early days and presents a theory about who might be behind the world’s first cryptocurrency.
The documentary focuses on Bitcoin Core developer Peter Todd as a potential candidate for Satoshi Nakamoto. Hoback presents several pieces of evidence to support this theory, including similarities in writing style between Todd and Satoshi, Todd’s early efforts to create a digital currency, and the nature of Bitcoin’s underlying code.
One key piece of evidence highlighted in the film is a forum post where Todd replied to Satoshi. Hoback suggests this could be Todd continuing his own thought using multiple accounts.
The director also points to Todd’s teenage attempts to turn the Hashcash experiment into a functional currency and what has been described as non-professional-level C++ code in the Bitcoin protocol.
However, the documentary’s claims have been met with skepticism from the cryptocurrency community. Critics argue that the evidence presented is largely circumstantial and based on questionable assumptions.
Many industry experts have dismissed the theory as speculative, echoing previous unsuccessful attempts to unmask Satoshi.
Shortly before the documentary aired, Todd himself addressed the speculation on social media, stating, “I’m not Satoshi.” This denial adds to the ongoing debate surrounding the film’s claims.
I’m not Satoshi.
— Peter Todd (@peterktodd) October 8, 2024
The documentary also revisits other figures long associated with Bitcoin’s creation, including Blockstream CEO Adam Back and the late cryptographer Hal Finney. While these individuals have made significant contributions to Bitcoin’s development, their exact roles in its creation remain unclear.
Samson Mow, CEO of Bitcoin technology company JAN3 and former chief strategy officer of Blockstream, who appears in the documentary, expressed doubt about the theory. He told Decrypt,
“Cullen probably has a case for it. I did say on record in the documentary that it’s probably not Peter.”
The release of “Money Electric” has not significantly impacted the cryptocurrency market. Bitcoin’s price remained stable at around $62,200 in the 24 hours following the documentary’s premiere, according to CoinGecko data.
This lack of market reaction suggests that the crypto community may be growing weary of unproven claims about Satoshi’s identity.
Critics have compared “Money Electric” to previous attempts to unmask Satoshi, including the infamous 2014 Newsweek article that wrongly identified an unrelated man as the Bitcoin creator.
Such incidents have made the community more cautious about accepting new theories without substantial proof.
Despite its high production value and engaging interviews, “Money Electric” has been criticized for relying too heavily on circumstantial evidence and confirmation bias.
Some members of the crypto community have expressed concern that such speculation could lead to unwanted attention or even attempts at extortion directed at the individuals named in these theories.
The documentary’s release highlights the ongoing fascination with Satoshi Nakamoto’s identity. However, many in the cryptocurrency space argue that Bitcoin has evolved beyond the need for a known creator.
As Mow stated, “It doesn’t matter who Satoshi is at this point. Bitcoin has grown past the need for a creator.”
As the search for Satoshi Nakamoto continues, “Money Electric” joins a growing list of documentaries and investigations that have attempted to solve this modern financial mystery. While it provides an intriguing look into Bitcoin’s early days, the film ultimately falls short of providing definitive proof of Satoshi’s identity.
